DosTips.com

even shorter. setlocal set "args=%1 %2" for /f "tokens=1-3" %%1 in ("!args! FEDCBA9876543210") do ( if defined %%~1 ( if "" neq "!%%~1:~255!" ( if "" neq "!%%~1:~4095!" ( set "$=!%%~1:~4095!" ) else set "$=!%%~1!" set "$scale=!$:~255,1!!$:~511,1!!$:~767,1!!$:~1023,1!!$:~1279,1!!$:~1535,1!!$:~1791,1!...

I was referring to the slowing down of the "set": Why does SET performance degrade as environment size grows? This is a version that reduces the macro size while still maintaining almost all of its speed. It's a good fit for me. setlocal set "args=%1 %2" for /f "tokens=1,2" %%1 in ("!args!") do ( if...

I tried to optimize the upper part even more, this is the code and the times setlocal set "args=str len" for /f "tokens=1,2" %%1 in ("!args!") do ( if defined %%~1 ( if "" neq "!%%~1:~255!" ( if "" neq "!%%~1:~4095!" ( set "$=!%%~1:~4095!" ) else set "$=!%%~1!" set "$scale=!$:~255,1!!$:~511,1!!$:~76...

I made another version that's even faster, but I discarded it because the macro was too long and the env for Win 10 is a problem.

I haven't tried it on Windows 11, but they told me the set problem related to the env size is no longer there.

Do you know if this is the case?

I took the last one you made and optimized it a bit. I removed a "Set" from everything and removed another set for some lengths. Also in the upper part from 4096 to 8192. I compared it, and it's faster than the last one. Of course, I compared the code without the macros. I think you'll have to figur...

It's been a year since the version I had on my PC. Yours seems faster. I haven't had time to study it. I added it to the old tests and I think the added checks and setlocal slow it down a bit. Now I'm studying it to see if there's anything I can improve on in terms of speed. @echo off setlocal Enabl...

... "_SIN=a-a*a/1920*a/312500+a*a/1920*a/15625*a/15625*a/2560000-a*a/1875*a/15360*a/15625*a/15625*a/16000*a/44800000" this seemed to have an algorithm protection ex) 1+3 =4 or (1/2 + 3/40*20)*200/100=4 there is no protection, if you calculate the third term for x=7000, with your formula it gives 13...

@miskox I'm trying that formula 10000*y/10/2 and mathematically since there is a multiplication by 10000 (which has 2 and 5 among the prime factors) the division by these should give an exact integer result without remainder or fractional part. That is, for any Y in that formula there is no remainde...

... In addition worked around the bug: "if 2147483647 LSS -1 echo true" echoes "true" on windows xp home 32 bit (?!) but it's not a bug only for "-1" it does it for all the pairs that have the same representation and with the bit sign different. At least it seems to me. On win10 if 2123153877 lss -...

basically the question is this. Is it possible to bypass the endlocal barrier/tunnel inside a call of variables that have LF or in any case the code to create multiline macros? I enter the procedure with the value of the delayed variables or active or inactive, then I activate it if necessary, I do ...

I explained myself badly. I expanded the code hoping that you can understand where I'm having difficulty I have a code that reads a file and prepares the macro in this format: set macro=<code>[LF]<code>[LF]<etc> @echo off setlocal enabledelayedexpansion rem From Honguito98 idea call :AutomacroLite "...

unfortunately with macros and the various /escape/ etc substitutions I have never been able to. I am making a "Lite" version of the "automacro" program that Terry T3rror made https://www.dostips.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11339 . This is because I need to keep the macros also in the form of subpr...

2icarius and 2einstein: I don't want to argue. I just thought that it was obvious to use ESC sequences for Win10+ without writting this (maybe somebody has Win10 only so this would look better). Or to have two different codes or one code with a check if OS WIN10+ or not. Saso yes yes it's better to...

I also wanted to tell Antonio that when he said that cmd couldn't postpone writing and did it right away, he was right. But it's exactly because of that way that the flickering could be created. Instead, if we ask it to write when everything is updated and maybe the "time" variable is also updated. ...

be good don't argue. The issue has been in limbo for a long time. Actually that code was written when windows 10 didn't have escape sequences yet. So that code was developed when escape sequences didn't exist so it didn't include the use of windows 10 sequences. At the time other mechanisms were use...